Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Re:modern
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Deleted through PROD; debate here moot. Xoloz 18:56, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Re:modern
This was nominated for AfD incorrectly. Fixing this, I did not nominate. -- H·G (words/works) 23:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
Spammy corporate article with no notability Antares33712 23:25, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
- Question This page has on it an uncontested prod and an uncontested prod2 - why is it here? GassyGuy 23:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC) Adding: This is showing up in a screwy manner right now on AfD main page. My comment is in reference to Re:modern, not pogoaddiction. GassyGuy 23:48, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
-
- Still the article is unencyclopedic. Delete 216.141.226.190 04:15, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- Speedy Close, the article has active and uncontest PROD and PROD2 tagged to it for the last four days; this does not need to be reviewed in AfD at the moment. -- H·G (words/works) 07:40, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- comment if those were removed, then we would still have to vote. I just want to ensure crap like this doesn't reappear Antares33712 14:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- The correct procedure for this is to nominate for AfD only when a prod or speedy delete tag is removed. If the article is worth a prod, chances are it'll fail to survive an AfD; nominating for both doesn't add any insurance that deletion will occur, nor should it. -- H·G (words/works) 17:45, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
