Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rbardwell

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep as this has been moved into userspace; relist at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion if so desired. Can't sleep, clown will eat me 05:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] User:Rbardwell

Autobiographical, fails 100 year tests, fails google test, fails expandability test. TRosenbaum 04:12, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Not even in the same zip code as notability. Ted 04:25, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

Uhhhh.... this is a user page - not an article - right? RN 04:29, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

• Comment It was a vanity article, but it was userfied. Wkdewey 04:38, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment. What's allowed on a user page and what's allowed in an article are different. This should be taken to miscellany for deletion, as user pages are. — TKD::Talk 05:20, 26 May 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy keep Userpages go in Miscellany for Deletion. jgp 05:24, 26 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.