Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond kertezc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory. Natalie 21:30, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Raymond kertezc

Raymond kertezc (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article is entirely unreferenced, and apparent original research. John254 04:43, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep Unbelievably, at first, I did not believe it either; it turns out to be true. There are more than just a few articles that are referenced when you Google the term. The article definitely needs to be rewritten....but I say keep.Shoessss 04:52, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I don't see "more than just a few articles" about this, a couple of blogs, some forum posts, that's it. Even if it was notable, the article wouldn't need re-writing, there's not much more that could be said about it. Croxley 05:25, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory since this is just reference to a control question that is common in the MMPI. Mr. Berry 22:16, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory.--Xnuala (talk) 22:59, 25 March 2007 (UTC)
• Merge and Redirect to Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory --Infrangible 03:37, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Strong delete - no need to redirect; also, WP:V concerns. And agreed, Shoessss, I'm not seeing more than just a few google hits. Patstuart^talk·edits 02:13, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.