Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raymond Towers Holmes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. → Ξxtreme Unction {^yakł_blah} 13:43, 10 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Raymond Towers Holmes

Makes a claim to notability so can't qualify for a speedy, but probably is not encyclopedia-worthy. Merge if desired to some appropriate page of pilots, but otherwise delete. Stifle 15:26, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

• Keep - appears to be both notable and verifiable. Had a documentatry on Channel 5 about the recovery of his craft which is now in the Imperial War Museum. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 16:41, 2 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I get 62 Google hits for "Raymond Towers Holmes", and almost all of those are repeats of his obituary notice. It's an interesting story, and verifiable, but I don't think he met WP:BIO while he was alive, and while his death has brought some renewed notice, I still don't think he is notable enough for an article. -- Dalbury^(Talk) 03:07, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
  • The documentary I mentioned above was broadcast when he was alive. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 14:46, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• Keep: Real heroism by real people verifiably in historic conflicts deserves a much greater place in Wikipedia than any amount of video game character cruft. If we can't delete that kind of cruft, we can keep the real stuff. Hu 04:20, 3 December 2005 (UTC)
• keep, subject of nationally broadcast documentary. Kappa 04:41, 6 December 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.