Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ray Blockers

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy delete as nonsense and also as an attack page - note the allegations of drug abuse, etc.Blnguyen | rant-line 01:18, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ray Blockers

OK, does owning a nightclub and making "several fleeting appearances in the Kaiser Chiefs DVD 'Enjoyment'" make you notable? Mind you, since AfD is not a cleanup squad, I'll draw a veil over the POV and unencyclopaedic nonsense in this article. :-( BlueValour 22:40, 27 June 2006 (UTC)

• No. Delete per nom, fails WP:NPOV, WP:VAIN, and WP:BIO. --Coredesat talk 22:57, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom, per Cordesat and because his name returns 74 unique google hits and I'm not sure any are to him (mostly sunglasses).--Fuhghettaboutit 23:50, 27 June 2006 (UTC)
• Not just delete, but speedy delete. Obvious nonsense: the sooner it's gone, the less the smell. --Calton | Talk 00:09, 28 June 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete as NN bio. Tagging now... --Bugwit Speak / Spoken 00:52, 28 June 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.