Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratt F.C.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete as a non-notable club. Turnstep 17:59, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ratt F.C.

Amateur indoor football team, no evidence that they are particularly notable. The bar for football clubs is generally set much high than this. — sjorford++ 07:37, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. All of the Google links that come up seem to be about completely different topics. Additionally, all of the people involved in the founding and maintaining of the club are red-linked, further supporting its non-notability. - Thorne N. Melcher 09:32, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. – Elisson • Talk 11:48, 6 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete As a non notible football club. Thε Halo ^Θ 12:56, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

Have any of you ever heard of Bury F.C. Didn't think so, but your not going to delete them are you? Of all the insignificant football teams on wikipedia, this is hardly the most obscure —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikosss13 (talk • contribs)

Yes, I have heard of Bury FC. (that's assuming you mean this one). They're an Eglish club playing in league two. The difference is that Bury is a professional football team, and notible, while Ratt F.C. is an amateur team. It simply is not notable. Thε Halo ^Θ 14:57, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete no claim to notability --RMHED 17:15, 6 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.