Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ratana Burapharat

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was this article ends in the same as every fairy tale in which the Prince and the Princess live happily together ever after—and have their story deleted from Wikipedia. Kimchi.sg 12:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ratana Burapharat

Delete, this appears to be original research. Gay Cdn 23:57, 8 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Either that or plagiarized, and those caps are getting on my nerves. tmopkisn ^tlka 01:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom. When an editor, 'powerful' or otherwise, addresses you directly in the copy, mmm, time to delete. --Coil00 01:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete just look at it. Danny Lilithborne 03:03, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Fiction. (except for a grand total of Zero Ghits on the name...)Bridesmill 03:16, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:NOR and WP:V. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 04:14, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete "If I mention Ratana Burapharat, a lot of you might wonder who is she?" ... Not really. Is she a friend of Mr. Google? [1]. Apparently not. --IslaySolomon 04:43, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOR. Near incomprehensible. Probably meets A7 as well. --DarkAudit 05:08, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• delete - non-notable nonsense. Rob 10:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as above. J Milburn 12:00, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per Bridesmill and IslaySolomon. Luna Santin 12:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.