Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raphael Bergmann

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Coredesat 05:18, 6 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Raphael Bergmann

Raphael Bergmann (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Other than being the party leader of a bunch of far-right scumbags [individuals], I can see no evidence of individual notability. She shows up on the usual Nazi-watch type of websites, but there's no media interest or impartial secondary sourcing here. -Doc^g 12:55, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

• Merge with Northern_Alliance_(Canada) -- Dougie WII 13:25, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - No significant coverage in reliable secondary sources. See WP:N. Subdolous 14:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

*Weak keep appears to be notable in the subculture of racists. Upon closer reading of article it is apparent that no information exists in it that is not contained in the Northern_Alliance_(Canada) article. Delete this as it appears that there is nothing more to this person than already stated. Bigdaddy1981 16:47, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Can you find *any* independent evidence of notability? I mean any? INdeed, can you find any reliable sources at all?--Doc^g 16:57, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

http://www.bnaibrith.ca/publications/audit2000/audit2000-03.html Bigdaddy1981 19:05, 1 November 2007 (UTC)

Hmm. Only mentioned in 1 paragraph: Raphael Bergmann, the organizer of the Northern Alliance group in London, Ontario, received some attention when he tried to counter-demonstrate against gay pride parades in several locations. This small offshoot group is known as StraightPride Inc. and had little impact on gay pride festivities. CWC 03:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete unless citations from reliable sources are provided to establish notability. Stifle (talk) 17:12, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Appears to be notable, but appearance does not seem to survuve any kind of scrutiny. Guy (Help!) 23:52, 1 November 2007 (UTC)
• Delete I see no notability here. CWC 03:25, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
• Comment. Two of you here appear to have violated WP:BLP and WP:NPA in this AfD by using the terms 'scumbags' and 'dirtbags'. It is clearly stated that you should not use this kind of attacking language anywhere in Wikipedia, no matter how much you disagree with something. See WP:CBLANK.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 14:16, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

I agree, please don't use this type of language. Can you blank that language? Thanks, --A. B. ^(talk) 17:10, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete -- Google News Archive search turns up nothing relevant. --A. B. ^(talk) 17:12, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

Nothing in the Toronto Globe and Mail going back to the start of their online archives 1-1-2000. --A. B. ^(talk) 17:20, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletions. —A. B. ^(talk) 17:41, 2 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.