Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ransom Paid Apparel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sango123 03:03, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ransom Paid Apparel

Spam, plain and simple. Tagged for speedy but we still don't seem to have a "blatant spam" CSD criterion. Just zis Guy you know? 19:55, 25 July 2006 (UTC)

 AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Rje 00:29, 2 August 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. Non notable company fails WP:CORP. alphaChimp ^laudare 01:42, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete. It's a dead-end page minus the AFD template, it's blatant spam, it's NN, it's a little bit of WP:VSCA. TrackerTV 01:44, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable spam. Some P. Erson 01:47, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - per nom. If a blanket "blatant spam" CSD criterion is being resisted, perhaps one authorized for creations by anon or new single-purpose users could be proposed? - David Oberst 05:36, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete spam. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 11:34, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as spam. Also fails WP:NPOV Thε Halo ^Θ 16:17, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as spam. There really should be a better spam policy. I notice User:JzG removed the spam links; I've long thought that is common sense, but have never seen a policy for that. Too much of a blanket policy may be too subjective, and anon can't create articles anymore. But single use accounts seem like a special case that should be accounted for. -Sanbeg 18:06, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. nn spam and advertising. G.He 21:04, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, spamvert. --Coredesat talk. ^_^ 06:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.