The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Found while patrolling candidates for speedy deletion. The given reason was: outdatable and non-notable enough list. This is not a valid speedy reason. As this is a procedural nomination, I am neutral. —— Eagle101Need help? 14:34, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
Speedy delete, if not for the reasons given before, it's definitely a copyvio. Tagging as such. Arkyan • (talk) 16:17, 24 May 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.