Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ranidaphobia
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep/redirect. I have just found that a reasonably encyclopedic article, fear of frogs, is possible. `'Míkka 16:31, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Ranidaphobia
Transwiki & Delete nothing more than a dictionary definition, sub-stub Carlossuarez46 20:30, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
-
- What are you, ranidaphobiaphobic? (which is, of course, afraid of those that are afraid of frogs). Just kidding. Move to Wiktionary. Keeper76 20:54, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Redirect to -phob-#Zoophobias and add entry there. --Lenticel (talk) 23:24, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
- Transwiki per Carlos Mandsford 01:52, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- Transwiki per above. ffm 16:58, 27 September 2007 (UTC)
- swift and merciless delete, no transwiki, nonnotable neologism. wiktionary is not a place for garbage. Mukadderat 00:02, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
-
-
- um, "Ranidaphobia" has been in Wiktionary since October 2004 here Most -phobic entries end up staying even if nominated for deletion, and even if perceived as neologistic garbage, because of the vast amount of sources that can be found (ie, online lists). I say, delete from WP and leave the Wiktionary article as is. In a move of unusual boldness on my part, I went ahead and added it to the already existing list mentioned above by Lenticel as an appropriate placement -- Keeper | 76 15:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of factoids. If you can find a reliable text with encyclopedi information about "ranidaphobia", you are welcome to add an article. There is plentty of garbage floating in the internet, and wikipedia is not a place to colelct it. Please see -phob-#Phobia lists. `'Míkka 16:07, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
- um, "Ranidaphobia" has been in Wiktionary since October 2004 here Most -phobic entries end up staying even if nominated for deletion, and even if perceived as neologistic garbage, because of the vast amount of sources that can be found (ie, online lists). I say, delete from WP and leave the Wiktionary article as is. In a move of unusual boldness on my part, I went ahead and added it to the already existing list mentioned above by Lenticel as an appropriate placement -- Keeper | 76 15:00, 2 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
