Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rangi meads

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 05:31, 15 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rangi meads

Rangi meads (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Nomination for deletion Fails WP:V. No relevant google or google books hits. Zero Factiva hits. Did not speedy delete as this article does make claim to notability. To me, it reads like it was written in earnest (though maybe I'm just not familiar with Kiwi humour cues), so also bringing it to afd to see if anyone comes up with something more (e.g. if the name has been misspelt) Bwithh 03:00, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete per nom. Let's put this "article" out of its misery. MER-C 04:35, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speey delete as horrible WP:BIO v*nity piece. SkierRMH,09:05, 10 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete obviously. DrKiernan 11:38, 14 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.