Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Randum Films

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. W.marsh 13:40, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Randum Films

Non-notable "web based production company", begun in March. Featuring the work of "Etan" ("Actor, photographer, marketing executive, philosopher, musician...is an amazing and humble man) -- which is, coincidentally enough, the name of the article creator, who also removed the "Prod" tag without comment. "Randum Films" gets 553 Google hits, only 28 of which are unique and which are, shall we say, of low quality. Calton | Talk 08:14, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete, not notable, prod tag removed by editor. --Coredesat 09:05, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete nn. Also, WP is not a free web host or blog. Tychocat 09:45, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • What was the "prod" tag for. I've asked with no reply. You guys do not like to help people with questions. And what does Word Press have to do with anything? -- Etan 15:38, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
    • "WP" doesn't stand for Word Press in this context, but rather for Wikipedia. And "Prod" is Wikipedia jargon for a message like this:
It is proposed that this article be deleted, because of the following concern:
nn "web based production company", begin in March.
If you can address this concern by improving, copyediting, sourcing, renaming or merging the page, please edit this page and do so. You may remove this message if you improve the article, or if you otherwise object to deletion of the article for any reason. To avoid confusion, it helps to explain why you object to the deletion, either in the edit summary or on the talk page. If this template is removed, it should not be replaced.
The article may be deleted if this message remains in place for five days (This template was added: 19 June 2006).
If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy.
In short, you should attempt to improve the article so that it is acceptable according to the deletion policy. TruthbringerToronto 19:43, 24 June 2006 (UTC)
  • I did begin working on improving article quality only to be attacked. You guys have an interesting way of inviting people to help with Wikipedia. -- Etan 15:17, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Reality check: removing the prod tag and adding pointless detail abou yourself -- without addressing the actual issues raised in the text of the plainly visible tag -- isn't "improving article quality". --Calton | Talk 23:53, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Regardless of article quality, this company in terms of its status and influence at the moment, is very unlikely to be acceptable as a subject for a Wikipedia article Bwithh 01:29, 25 June 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.