Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Random evolution

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy Delete --Tone 22:35, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Random evolution

Random evolution (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

What??? Apparently this is about an utterly non-notable band. Plus, I could not find any actual information in the article. Aleph-4 15:41, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete. This pretty well perfects the technique of "a large wall of text makes people with no attention span believe you have lots to say, so you can put in absolutely no information". Please no meatpuppets saying "I love this band, they deserve a Wikipedia article!" -Amarkov ^blah_edits 15:44, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, makes no attempt to pass WP:MUSIC, borderline speedy. Demiurge 15:48, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete fails WP:MUSIC -- Whpq 16:31, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete Vanity page, merely attempts to boost traffic to their geocities website. Charlie 20:08, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Fails WP:MUSIC and possible conflict of interests (the contributors are "Random evolution" and "fugiscool"). —ShadowHalo 03:32, 22 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete This page is an absolute waste of space. It would take forever to wikify it, and there's no point in that because it's really irrelevant, non-NPOV, original research stuff. What more do you want? -Zepheriah 00:12, 23 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete, WP:CSD#A7. Jobjörn (Talk ° contribs) 19:15, 25 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.