Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ramosity

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Shanel 00:41, 17 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Ramosity

Protologism, 116 unique Google hits [1]. Delete. Fang Aili 19:39, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non-notable unstable neologism, i.e. protologism / protoneologism. — Adrian Lamo ·· 19:44, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete ramositously. Bucketsofg 19:54, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• delete per bucketsofg. Niffweed17, Destroyer of Chickens 20:05, 11 March 2006 (UTC)

User:citanes its in the urban dictionary and as it states in the page it was a editorial page. that fact that it has been brought up for deletion is eveidence of ramosity in of itself.--Citanes 00:12, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

• Delete DVD+ R/W 22:50, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. dbtfz^talk 23:20, 11 March 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above --Khoikhoi 02:19, 12 March 2006 (UTC)
• Keep 116 unique Google hits?? That's more than you get. DELETE YOU! --cereffusion 22:03, 12 March 2006

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.