Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rami Nuri
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was no consensus to delete -- Francs2000 | Talk 
02:35, 5 August 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Rami Nuri
Not notable (50 hits) and/or vanity, and I'm tempted to suggest nonsense... Delete. Flowerparty talk 21:40, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- I'm adding Gopal Das as well, this seems like a set of nonsense Eckankar-cruft created by User:Grizzmaster and enhanced by User:67.149.10.55. Delete for both of them. Klonimus 24.60.163.16 21:50, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep for both. This is one of those things where the Google test simply doesn't apply. If he's a figure in a religion- Eckankar- then there's no more reason to delete this than to delete Xenu of Scientology. Xenu is, by the way, a featured article. CanadianCaesar 21:53, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Hmm, I was worried that might be the response. I've removed Gopal Das, since it was not my intention to VfD both.
Nonetheless I feel for Rami Nuri a redirect may be more useful than what's there now.Flowerparty talk 22:04, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Hmm, I was worried that might be the response. I've removed Gopal Das, since it was not my intention to VfD both.
- Strong Keep for both. This is one of those things where the Google test simply doesn't apply. If he's a figure in a religion- Eckankar- then there's no more reason to delete this than to delete Xenu of Scientology. Xenu is, by the way, a featured article. CanadianCaesar 21:53, 24 July 2005 (UTC)
- Looking back on this I've made a severe misjudgement: I took Rami Nuri to be a person (hence my vanity accusation). I apologise and retract my previous vote. Keep. Flowerparty talk 00:42, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Nonsense Eckankar cruft. Klonimus 05:52, 25 July 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Keep One of the major religious figures of the religion Eckankar. A religion without it's major figures is worthless. Think about Christianity without Jesus, or Judaism without Abraham. Werty8472 July, 24, 2005.
- Delete advertising. JamesBurns 06:44, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Save If you would take the time to notice, there is no advertisement on the ECK master pages. Just because the religion page itself has external links is no reason to VfD everything related to it.
- Last vote by 216.214.203.14 CanadianCaesar 22:02, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
- Strong Save If you would take the time to notice, there is no advertisement on the ECK master pages. Just because the religion page itself has external links is no reason to VfD everything related to it.
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.
