Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raj Mukerji

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus, default to keep. —Doug Bell ^talk 08:20, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Raj Mukerji

Raj Mukerji (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Neutral bump from speedy. —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-11-21 07:38Z

• Delete, nn lobbyist, intern and grad student. Hornplease 09:34, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, nn person, as per nom.... SkierRMH,10:07, 21 November 2006 (UTC)

  Do you mean "per Hornplease"? —Quarl ^(talk) 2006-11-21 11:46Z

• Keep coverage looks good. - crz crztalk 17:55, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep lots of press; the kid is apparently a multimillionaire. talk 22:36, 22 November 2006 (UTC)— PortugueseSensation2134 (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic..
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- Agεθ020 (ΔT • ФC) 21:12, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
• Keep - Refs section backs notabilityBakaman _Bakatalk 03:53, 23 November 2006 (UTC)
• Strong Keep- Convincing references forced me to say so .  Nileena joseph ^{(Talk|Contribs)} 15:54, 23 November 2006 (UTC)

I don't see how the simple presence of references causes notability. Hornplease 21:42, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

• Delete unless toned down. Notability and sources too feeble to support this puff piece. ~ trialsanderrors 06:13, 30 November 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.