Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainz

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mailer Diablo 20:42, 22 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Rainz

Should player-nicks from Online Games have their own article? Even if they are somehow "famous" inside the game? what comes next? each leader of the biggest clan for every MMOG wants also his wikipedia page.. Maybe Rainz wants to do a wikipedia-user-page instead, i don't know if thats okay. Jestix 20:28, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Merge with the Ultima Online article--it was a notable event and a notable prodcut. 206.156.242.36 20:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment The Lord British assasination is already mentioned in the Ultima Online article, the rest of Rainz is not notable if you ask me (like the attack of the naked army or the morphed chicken stuff). Jestix 21:05, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. Scorpiondollprincess 20:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, While this entry may belong in an MMO-specific wiki, it is NN here. --EazieCheeze 20:45, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Gamecruft. Artw 22:44, 17 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete player. --Peta 00:49, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete NN/Vanity -- Alias Flood 00:53, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, unencyclopedic gamecruft. --Kinu t/c 04:40, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Redirect with chainsaw-trimming merge to Lord British where the assassination thingy is already covered to some detail. The event was quite notable, covered in game magazines and all, but I think the assassination's subject is much more notable than the assassin in this case. That's the only modicum of notability here that, I think, justifies its existence as a redirect... but not really much else. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:58, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
    • Comment okay "rescued" the explanation of lord british death, is there anything else mentionworthy left the Rainz article say that isn't covered Lord British? --Jestix 16:42, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete cruft (or, alternatively, neither notable nor verifiable from reliable sources). Angus McLellan (Talk) 20:01, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
  • Merge with the Ultima Online article - but definitely should be kept User:Murple 22:05, 20 July 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.