Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rainstorm Rock
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Sr13 is almost Singularity 22:05, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Rainstorm Rock
This appears to be original research and a neologism. I can't find any reliable sources that discuss it. Heck a google search estimates about 74 pages with the term, the vast majority of which seem to be false positive. See [1] JoshuaZ 03:03, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Stroooong Delete Completely Unreferenced, found no viable sources after quite a few searches. -- Jimmi Hugh 03:12, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete nothing but original research and it looks like a hoax. "musical genre...that conjures up images in the listeners mind of a singer usually in a tight t-shirt standing in the middle of a country road in the rain with his arms out to his side, a la Crucifixion", um what? T Rex | talk 05:41, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete for reasons above and for several catchy acronyms, mainly WP:NOR, WP:V and a good dose of WP:CB. Mmmmmm. OBM | blah blah blah 09:11, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Though there's an article out there that refers to Coldplay as "kings of rainstorm rock," it never identifies the term, and I couldn't find any other reputable source. That seems to eliminate widespread usage, if nothing else. --Moonriddengirl 12:32, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - per nom Onnaghar(T/C) 14:27, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. WP:OR. Bart133 (t) (c) 19:06, 1 August 2007 (UTC)
- Weak delete per above. Probably not ready yet for "prime time" notability. Few Ghits exist: [2], and many of those are blogs or WP mirrors. If deleted, do not salt, and wait for the term to catch on in another year. Bearian 17:08, 4 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.