Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raina rose

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete IronGargoyle 17:46, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Raina rose

Raina rose (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Appears to be spam by NN artist; non-sales/blog Ghits hard to come by. Askari Mark (Talk) 04:24, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Keep. She does have a lot of Google hits with potential sources for the article, I suggest we wait it out. --Nevhood 04:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

And move the article to Raina Rose --Nevhood 04:38, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

• Neutral: While there are a lot of Google hits the page does look like an ad and the creator, I suspect, is the artist or her production company (See: contribs). This was that user's only contribution. Additionally I am not sure if any of the first few pages of web hits establish notability. I saw a lot of concert announcements, some cds for sale stuff, her myspace and website, her record company etc etc. This may seem like a lot of sources but I don't know if they are reliable, especially regarding notability. I mean, a lot of NN bands have production companies and websites and CDs and concerts. Seems suspect, at the very least it needs cleaned up, badly and/or tagged accordingly.A mcmurray (talk • contribs) 10:55, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Comment: Yes, there are quite a few Ghits, but when you begin looking at them, they are page after page of ads for selling CDs, artist/label promos, blogs, and brief myspace comments/"reviews". If there was a single notable independent review, I couldn't find it in the first five Ghit pages or skimming through the next five. Best I can tell is that she may be an up-and-coming — but not yet notable — talent and principally a local phenomenon limited to Oregon. Askari Mark (Talk) 20:26, 4 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Every review available seems to be listed on her press kit[1] page, and I can't see anything major enough to save her. --Groggy Dice T | C 00:45, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. I'm always suspicious when every single link in an article is an external link to some form of advertisement for the subject of the article of their cohorts. Verkhovensky 03:26, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.