Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Raiffeisen Observation Tower (second nomination)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2006-12-29 05:54Z

[edit] Raiffeisen Observation Tower

Raiffeisen Observation Tower (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Empty article about a 35m observation tower. Previous AfD had 1 keep !vote but was rather poorly attended. No indication of significance. German Wiki article doesn't seem to reveal its significance either but goes into a bit more detail about its height, location, nearby towers, zzzzzzzzz... Deizio talk 02:48, 24 December 2006 (UTC)

Article has been expanded with translation from de-wiki. Seems my German skills are still pretty tight. Deizio talk 17:44, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable; notability not asserted, no non-wiki ghits. Maybe a hoax. Akihabara 03:16, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Bigtop 03:23, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete No assertion of notability. Hello32020 04:12, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Doesn't look notable enough. TSO1D 04:28, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete Not sure why this is important.-- danntm T C 05:26, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete - unremarkable towercruft. MER-C 06:53, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment Am I the only one who finds the very existence in WP of towercruft, mastcruft, and other such detritus hilariously funny to read about and see? Charlie 07:41, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep and improve frummer 08:32, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete doesnt assert notability, only g-hits is wiki and the mirror sites. --Arnzy (talk • contribs) 11:36, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Germany-related deletions. -- Kusma (討論) 12:47, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, unless someone is able to prove that this tower is indeed notable. Until then, I guess I'll stick to my decision. Sorry. -Advanced 17:42, 24 December 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete, non-notable. CRGreathouse (t | c) 09:13, 28 December 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.