Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rahajan

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-03-01 08:08Z

[edit] Rahajan

Rahajan (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Non notable. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as nom. ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 01:41, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as non-notable, non-verifiable. -- Jeff3000 01:44, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Agree no evidence of notability and no reliable sources--Shirahadasha 02:47, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete no sources. Sounds as if it is made up. --† Ðy§ep§ion † ^{Speak your mind} 04:28, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Probably is made up, only three Google hits for "Rahajan religion" (none relevant) John Reaves (talk) 05:26, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per comments by John Reaves, as-well as this it does fail WP:NN and even if this was kept it would need some copy-edit, wikifying and overall cleanup.Tellyaddict 12:11, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Al-Bargit; Mešaism is equally notable (8 hits in google)
• Delete per Shirahadasha --Gwern (contribs) 21:29 25 February 2007 (GMT) 21:29, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Per above. Daniel5127 | Talk 23:09, 25 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete religioncruft. JuJube 06:34, 26 February 2007 (UTC)
• DeleteNo evidence not notable

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.