Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rafal Olaf von Schubert
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. —Xezbeth 15:12, Jun 22, 2005 (UTC)
[edit] Rafal Olaf von Schubert
Best permutation of names gets 2 discrete Google hits. Title gets zero. Definitely non-notable, probably hoax. Denni☯ 02:32, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
-
- Note: VfD template keeps getting removed from the page. --cesarb 13:57, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Speedy Patent vanity. Likely hoax. How many 21 year old commentators does the BBC have? I'm guessing 0. --Xcali 03:18, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Xcali, you know perfectly well this isn't patent vanity. I doubt it's even vanity, for that matter. And even if it were, vanity is not a criterion for speedy delete. Until policy changes, that's why we have VfD. Denni☯ 05:09, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
- Let's see, 21 years old, claims of outstanding achievements, no evidence of those claims. Probably created just to put his name in an article. I'd call that patent vanity bordering on nonsense. --Xcali 22:17, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Anyone can enter their comments on the BBC discussion pages on the wonderful BBC website. This does not, however, make them BBC commentators. Jez 17:17, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Let's see, 21 years old, claims of outstanding achievements, no evidence of those claims. Probably created just to put his name in an article. I'd call that patent vanity bordering on nonsense. --Xcali 22:17, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Xcali, you know perfectly well this isn't patent vanity. I doubt it's even vanity, for that matter. And even if it were, vanity is not a criterion for speedy delete. Until policy changes, that's why we have VfD. Denni☯ 05:09, 2005 Jun 16 (UTC)
- Delete. Unverifiable. Unnotable. Looks like vanity to me. -Snorre/Antwelm 07:39, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete unverifiable. JamesBurns 07:52, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete Clusty doesn't provide any relevant links to his literature. And a google search on "Schubert" "BBC" "commentator" only yields results on a certain famous classical composer. Unverifiable. - Mgm|(talk) 08:56, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as per Ecclesiastes 1:2. — mark ✎ 10:36, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete through vfd--not speedy. Thanks, Denni. Meelar (talk) 13:55, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete vanity/unverified. --Etacar11 14:53, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete as hoax. Martg76 18:54, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep This person is noted in this German literature - Franz Schubert Herkunft und Verwandtschaft by Heinz Schöny on Schubert's family tree —Preceding unsigned comment added by Braderder (talk • contribs) 14:44, 19 Jun 2005
- New account; only contribution is this vote --cesarb 16:29, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - non-notable person. Maybe this kid is a descendant of THE Franz Schubert. So what? Jez 17:20, 19 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Keep Wow, there is a lot of negativity here. Anyways, like Braderder said you probably can find this individual in Franz Schubert Herkunft und Verwandtschaft by Heinz Schöny on Schubert's family tree, but I'm not sure. I have however read of this guy in Toronto Star, can't recall when. If anyone is from the metropolitan Toronto area maybe they can recall the date. Anyways, Mr. Schubert has also supporter of Stem Cell research as the article stated, but I wont't post until I find the article.--CanadianPride 00:53, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- User removed two comments while adding this vote. Account's first edit. --cesarb 01:11, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, unbelievable Schubert spoof. Speedy delete, SqueakBox 01:21, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
- Delete; nn. Not only are there only "two discrete google hits", they are both from Wikipedia itself. Antandrus (talk) 01:25, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
- KeepIf you use google, no wonder you can't find information on this individual.--HistoricalAce 20:18, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
- Account created 10 minutes before this vote; user's fourth edit. --cesarb 20:20, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
-
- This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.