Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radiohead overview and influence

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Radiohead overview and influence

• Delete or Merge and Delete: Fancruft and almost completely unreferenced. WP:NOR violation to a large degree. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
  • BTW, please scan through recent history because an IP is going through it removing content. Since it's all unsourced and edit summaries are being used, s/he is pretty justified IMHO but maybe something salvageable can be found in the deleted content. —Wknight94 (talk) 11:14, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom: WP:V and WP:NOR. PJM 11:43, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete or Merge and Delete. An overview and the influence of Radiohead belong in the article Radiohead. -newkai t-c 12:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as almost wholly Original research that shouldn't exists as a standalone article anyway; anything verifiable should be at Radiohead.--Isotope23 14:11, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

yes People, I am the one who is deleting the majority of the aritcle. I am the one that wknight94 was talking about, and yes untill you can source whatever it was that I deleted, I'm afraid it will stay deleted. 71.236.225.50 03:44, 15 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.