Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Radio Milinda

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Tiptoety talk 02:09, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Radio Milinda

Radio Milinda (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

non-notable pirate station, only 78 Google hits Rapido (talk) 00:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

  • Keep - I have added a number of sources to the article and flagged it for Rescue. Given that this radio station was around before the people that made google were born, I would say that it be best not to use Google as a notability guide. Notability, however, is established by my sources and the fact that this pirate radio station was the first Irish pirate station to be shut down by the police. Fosnez (talk) 02:29, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. WP:NOTBIGENOUGH should be considered when you are giving thought to this. As the article has already been tagged for WP:ARS, I think it's fine as is, but continued improvement couldn't hurt. Cel Talk to me 04:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ireland-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 09:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Radio-related deletion discussions. —• Gene93k (talk) 09:46, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep, notable pirate radio station, sufficient third-party sourcing in the article. Lankiveil (speak to me) 12:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC).
  • Weak keep. A fairly flimsy claim to notability, and some coverage that perhaps falls short of non-trivial coverage in reliable sources, but let's keep it for now and give it a chance to improve.--Michig (talk) 14:47, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep as reliable secondary sourcing is now provided so notability is established. Google hits are not always a reliable indicator for non-current people or organizations. - Dravecky (talk) 14:57, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep Notability is now asserted quite clearly through multiple sources. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 17:53, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep. SilkTork *YES! 10:59, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.