Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rack Attack

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Secret ^account 20:49, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Rack Attack

Rack Attack (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This article has been tagged for speedy delete and prodded for being SPAM. Original author has not complied completely with <hang-on> request but makes appropriate comment seeking assistance. That said it should got to AfD for consideration as to whether it is blatant advertising or not. --VS ^talk 07:14, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Note - editor had a relationship with a very similar article titled Rack N Road which has been speedily deleted 3 times over the past 12 months.--VS ^talk 07:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

• Comment It does have the article in the Denver Post. But what's a gutter-less raingutter? Tuvok[^T@lk/_Improve] 16:34, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete does not meet WP:CORP. To quote, "If the depth of coverage is not substantial, then multiple independent sources should be cited to establish notability." One Denver Post article does not meet these requirements. --mariusstrom 05:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per MariusStrom -Verdatum (talk) 18:09, 29 January 2008 (UTC)
• Delete, this is essentially an advertisement. TJRC (talk) 18:52, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.