Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Lamb

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. IceKarmaॐ 04:47, 26 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rachel Lamb

Looks like self-promotional or fan drivel. No mention of this woman on Google. -- Necrothesp 19:17, 18 September 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. No claim to notablility. Unverifiable. --A D Monroe III 20:09, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. TheMadBaron 21:49, 18 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as nn-bio, so tagged. Friday (talk) 02:22, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I removed the speedy tag as I think this AfD can clear it out. Its not a clear case if the writer was Ms. Lamb. Redwolf24 (talk) 03:46, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Comment out of curiosity, which part do you consider an assertion of notability? The only remote possibility I can find is "Rachel was and still is an amazing artist and photographer, whose skills unprecedented in her peers and role models will go on to inspire a nation of blossoming talent." If that's an assertion of notability, we may as well throw out all CSD's. Of course Afd CAN sort it out; the same can be said of any speedy. I thought the purpose of CSD was to save time and effort so Afds can concentrate on questionable cases. Friday (talk) 14:04, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete User_talk:Friday is quite right; this fits the criteria for speedy removal and should not have to go through the entire AfD process. Dottore So 16:20, 20 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.