Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rachel Bishop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. This is a Secret ^account 17:42, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rachel Bishop

Rachel Bishop (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Nominated purely for WP:COI issues within the article as one editor has bought up on the Moorcroft, also these entries unsourced and notability of these entries are questionable, plus these are nothing but a vanity page as these consists of nothing but a list of trivial information, plus where is the promised cleanup, it dosen't exist. Also looking at the User talk:Websitemad page, who created the article, that previous creation of the same person has been CFD'd before

On a note, I want to nominate Moorcroft, but this needs vast cleanup. Charley Uchea (talk) 17:08, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

• Obvious COI but notable potter: article should be kept and trimmed. --Paularblaster (talk) 17:48, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

As someone who attemmpted a partial clean-up, I declare an interest. I hope I am being objective when I state that a) this person is a notable ceramic designer b)the article needs trimming. The fact that there aren't many references is in part due to the fact that ceramic design is under-researched and many of the notable figures have been overlooked because they are women. --Alan (talk) 18:44, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Is she that notable? She doesnt look it to me: many of the GHits are not about her. (She looks like she is perhaps becoming collectable, but she is not a big name yet). I also dont buy the idea that she is not famous because 'ceramic design is under-researched' or that 'she is a woman'. What about Clarice Cliff? What about Suzie Cooper? Marcus22 (talk) 21:02, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

• Delete, but I would have no objection to a clean sheet recreation if she is that notable as I have never heard of her, considering I am from the area myself. I do agree with what Marcus22 with his comment about the women and ceramic design. Willirennen (talk) 22:13, 27 November 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.