Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabbinical taliban

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was G10 -- Y not? 22:18, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Rabbinical taliban

Rabbinical taliban (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Contested prod. Non-notable neologism - article is basically an unsourced, OR attack piece. GabrielF 15:02, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

• Delete Three hits on google, including the Wiki article. NN. --Javits2000 15:13, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Seems inflammatory and somewhat incoherent, as well as the already-mentioned issues. SamBC 15:32, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. —GabrielF 18:34, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, made up in school one day. who contested the deletion? Jon513 19:04, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment The original author, it would appear, contested the deletion. SamBC 22:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per above and all the templates on the article. --Shuki 20:43, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom.--DLand^TALK 20:59, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• My inner Cyberman says "Delete". I concur with him and the nom. --Agamemnon2 21:09, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom as unsourced attack page. --Metropolitan90 21:20, 4 July 2007 (UTC)
• Comment Might we invoke WP:SNOW here? I doubt any serious objections will arise to having it deleted immediately.--DLand^TALK 22:15, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.