This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was Delete. Redwolf24 (talk) 02:35, 27 August 2005 (UTC)
Doesn't appear to be an overly important figure; more of a vanity page than anything. Plus, poorly punctuated, etc. Keit 23:00, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
Keep. Moderately important figure, a factual and verifiable article can be written. Trollderella 23:24, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete as nn vanity. My local priest is well known in my community, too. That doesn't mean he deserves an article. Soltak 00:01, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete, vanity. Nandesuka 00:05, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
Delete I'm sure he's kind, but nn. --Etacar11 04:15, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.