Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabbi Yeroham Simsovic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl ^(talk) 2007-02-11 00:07Z

[edit] Rabbi Yeroham Simsovic

Rabbi Yeroham Simsovic (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Image:Rabbi Yeroham Simsovic.jpg (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (added by closing admin)

While this person may be nice, he is still too fresh to merit an entry. This is WP:NN and not enough for WP:BIO. Seems that the article was created by its subject as well (Yeri (talk · contribs) and Yeroham (talk · contribs)) thus it's also a case of WP:Vanity. Thanks, IZAK 12:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletions. IZAK 12:53, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per above. IZAK 12:47, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete Non notable. Nice person, I am sure, but not wiki worthy as current Avi 13:05, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom - Tragic Baboon (banana receptacle) 14:34, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. He sounds like a lovely man, but I don't see any evidence of notability per WP:BIO. -FisherQueen (Talk) 19:17, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete I haven't read even a claim to notability. The picture can stay. It might be useful for the article about the kind of tree (what kind of tree is it by the way). Jon513 22:15, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. No claim to notability. No sources. Also, the article reads enough like a new hire announcement to suggest that Wikipedia's content policies may not have have been adequately considered before this article was created. See WP:NOT#PUBLISH. --Shirahadasha 02:29, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Really glad I wasn't on dial-up when I clicked on the article and was greeted with a full size 1704x2272 vanity image which clearly should be cropped down to about 10% the size. RFerreira 08:54, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as nn. --MaNeMeBasat 15:33, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.