Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rabab

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Redirect to Rebab Ryan Norton ^{T | @ | C} 22:38, 19 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Rabab

I created this page under the spelling "rabab" using an old spelling; I later found out that "rubab" is the correct romanization and there was already an article on this instrument there. Thus, this page should be deleted. Thanks. Badagnani 03:48, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. If this is an old spelling, it should redirect to the modern romanization. Note that it began as a redirect, not to rubab, but to rebab, so it might be better off as a disambig, or those two targets might merit merging if they're the same thing (which is unclear). —Cryptic (talk) 08:00, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• It's not clear to me these three articles (rabab, rebab, rubab) don't all refer to the same thing. Can someone familiar with the subject comment? Pburka 14:36, 8 October 2005 (UTC)
• Should be redirected to Rebab, this exactly the same instrument, it's just slightly different and local pronouciation, as it's translated from Arabic where the sound a are e are very close --Khalid hassani 00:55, 15 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.