Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R 2763

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete all. - Mailer Diablo 16:58, 26 August 2005 (UTC)

[edit] R 2760, R 2762, R 2763, R 2764, R 2765, SPR 2790, SPR 2792

This is hilarious. Apparently, one user has started to integrate the 2004/05 ÖBB train schedule into Wikipedia. These pages do not describe train lines (which might be encyclopedic), but individual trains, giving their exact schedule. Also, train schedules have been added to the pages of the towns where the trains stop (e.g. Oberwart). Note that this information expires in December. Delete. Martg76 02:51, 19 August 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. As a transportation buff, I think this is too much. Wikipedia is not a travel guide. Gazpacho 03:13, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete No real possiblity of an encylopedic article emerging. Very hard to maintain. Zeimusu | (Talk page) 03:28, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Unmaintable Mussolini-cruft. Fernando Rizo T/C 03:32, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delte as per Zeimusu DES ^(talk) 03:35, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• This is the first instance of railcruft I've seen on Wikipedia. It'd be BJAODN-worthy if it wasn't so serious. Delete. AlbertR 06:36, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a railway schedule. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:53, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete this unencyclopedic cruft. Nandesuka 11:00, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Choo choo! Perhaps someone knowledgable could take the time to explain the reason these articles will (probably) be deleted to the original contributor, as he (it's not gonna be a she) has clearly put a lot of work into this. I especially like "URGENT: These information are only valid til 10 December 2005". Proto t c 11:04, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete how bizarre. Dottore So 14:11, 19 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all. Schedulecruft. -- BD2412 ^talk 15:10, August 19, 2005 (UTC)
• delete all individual railway stations are bad enough. --TimPope 07:54, 20 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not encyclopedic and mainly, unmainatainable. Pavel Vozenilek 15:59, 21 August 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.