Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RPGclassics

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 03:11, Jun 19, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] RPGclassics

Looooooooooooong, POV article about non-notable web forum. RickK 06:10, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)

  • Speedy Vanity. You beat me to it. It's also copyvio from the forum's site. --Xcali 06:11, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy I edited a bit too fast, it's not encyclopedic in the least. --Vile Requiem 06:13, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • As what I originally posted on the article itself was for it to be cleaned up, and it has, my vote is Keep. --Vile Requiem 04:32, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy. Gamaliel 06:34, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete non-notable -CunningLinguist 07:27, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy as vanity and copyvio. Jamyskis 07:37, 13 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy if only for vanity. -Tadanisakari 07:45, Jun 13, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as copyvio, though I would argue that RPGclassics.com *is* a notable site. I've certainly heard of it before. -- Jonel 02:30, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
    • Author claims permission. If verified, my vote is Keep. -- Jonel 02:47, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Cleanup - Forum may be notable but we don't need the gory details of every forum drama that ever took place. --FCYTravis 08:11, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
  • Speedy, just a random webpage. Radiant_>|< 09:31, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete vanity. JamesBurns 05:18, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.