Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/ROLF

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was redirect. Mindspillage (spill yours?) 06:49, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] ROLF

Little content. lol got deleted, so why shouldn't this. Howabout1 23:39, 3 Apr 2005 (UTC)

  • Comment: This was apparently either never listed on vfd or removed out of process, so I'm bringing it to today's page for resolution. —Korath (Talk) 00:15, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Rolfing, even though that's not the meaning the creator of the page intended. —Wahoofive | Talk 01:49, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • LOL (Internet slang) does seem to exist so there might be an argument for this too, but perhaps it would be best to merge and redirect these types of things to an Internet acronyms page? --Fuzzball! (talk) 02:53, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
    • That sounds like an excellent idea, Fuzzball! Strong concur, merge & redir. Radiant_* 08:14, Apr 14, 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with Internet slang, no need to redirect. — JIP | Talk 07:04, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Merge with Internet slang. The redirect won't do any harm. Thryduulf 15:20, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Rolfing. Klonimus 15:51, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • Redirected to Internet slang. 213.190.129.19 18:03, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Reverted. "Please do not remove or deface this notice or blank, merge, or move this article while the discussion is in progress. However, you are welcome to edit this article and improve it." -- Plutor 18:13, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.