Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RM-X General Purpose Control

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete ZsinjTalk 22:25, 12 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RM-X General Purpose Control

RM-X General Purpose Control (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Delete Non-notable software. Can't find any mentions on Google except Wikipedia mirrors, the software's own website and forum postings. Can't find a single independent review of the software. AlistairMcMillan 14:10, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Also if you use this tool http://vs.aka-online.de/cgi-bin/wppagehiststat.pl you'll see that Darkain, who wrote RM-X, is the biggest contributor. AlistairMcMillan 14:13, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 15:39, 28 February 2007 (UTC)

Keep With the growing interest in Wii Remote drivers, this software's notability is increasing. Wii Remote support should be mentioned in the article. Zophar 04:06, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

Sorry but Wii Remote support isn't even mentioned on Darkain's own wiki. http://wiki.darkain.com/wiki/Plugin
Can you cite a source that proves notability? A published review, or even a review at a site like Slashdot? AlistairMcMillan 05:16, 5 March 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mangojuicetalk 18:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. With no independent, credible reviews, we can't cover this topic while meeting WP:ATT and WP:NPOV. Maybe in the future, but when we can, it's a different story. Right now we can't, so delete. Mangojuicetalk 18:00, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.