Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RKO Industries

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete ~ trialsanderrors 17:10, 29 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] RKO Industries

RKO_Industries (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

It appears this page is an advertising/spam page for RKO industries--Alex 09:23, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete or possible speedy G11. Advertising tone, barely if at all notable company. Seraphimblade 09:26, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • I understand there is a 5 day period within which to discuss the consideration of deletion. I will make every effort to post my argument for inclusion later today. If not today, I will certainly post by tomorrow a.m. user:Recycledagplastic 13:25, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
    • I am working on Wikipedia's waste & recycling sections. If you can prove notability and make the article read not as a publicity piece for the company I would support you. In its present format I agree with Seraphimblade as a delete--Alex 13:58, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 20:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. Cbrown1023 20:24, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Keep. The article has multiple independent nontrivial references which demonstrate the company's notability. --TruthbringerToronto (Talk | contribs) 00:17, 21 November 2006 (UTC)
  • Very busy day. Still intend on posting argument. user:Recycledagplastic 21 November 2006
  • You have the nominated five days to make arguements, but I suggest that the time would be better spent constructively improving the article to a non-advertising tone so that people will support the articles inclusion.--Alex 17:26, 22 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.