Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RFC 3377

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was redirect to Lightweight Directory Access Protocol - Mailer Diablo 3 July 2005 17:14 (UTC)

[edit] RFC 3377

This isn't worth a wikipedia article. The RFC itself is tiny (it's really an index of a small number of other RFCs), and there isn't really anything interesting to write about it. Also, just as wikipedia isn't an RFC repository, it's not an RFC index either. RFC 3377 is mentioned as the latest version of the LDAP standards in Lightweight Directory Access Protocol, and that's enough.. Biot 11:58, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete or redirect to Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. All the real content here is the external link, and that is alreadt in the LDAP article. — JIP | Talk 12:01, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Non-encyclopedic stub. As noted before, Wikipedia is not an RFC repository. - Sikon 14:07, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete and/or redirect per the comments above. --TenOfAllTrades(talk) 15:27, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, as somebody might search for this (in fact, it looks like someone did, 18 months ago, which is when the stub was created). sjorford →•← 17:08, 21 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. Wikiacc (talk) 17:37, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Lightweight Directory Access Protocol. JamesBurns 06:45, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect; it's purely about LDAP jamesgibbon 15:14, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect. Gazpacho 15:53, 22 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Lightweight Directory Access Protocol.--Nabla 17:35, 2005 Jun 24 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.