Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/RCSCC Victory (2nd nomination)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete — Caknuck 02:52, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RCSCC Victory

RCSCC Victory (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

The previous nomination last December resulted in keep, based on the then unreferenced claim of being the first sea cadet corps in Canada. It's been 9 months with no reference being added. I've looked pretty hard to find a reference, but couldn't find one. The national organization Royal Canadian Sea Cadets has an article, but local sub-units of national organizations are not generally notable on their own and this article doesn't appear to establish its subject's individual notability. Sancho 06:05, 17 September 2007 (UTC)

• Delete per unavailability of reliable sources. --Oxymoron⁸³ 12:32, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, fails WP:ORG. --Dhartung | Talk 19:41, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - the article previously included an unsourced claim to notability as Canada's first sea cadet corps. That claim was removed as dubious (see diff). If that claim could be sourced (I wasn't able to find any) I would go with a weak keep. -- Whpq 17:09, 20 September 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.