Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/R. J. Morrison

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep Raichu 16:24, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] R. J. Morrison

Nonnotable biography with no incoming links -- FRCP11 06:26, 9 May 2006 (UTC)

• Delete sounds like it was an interesting and varied life, but I can't see notability.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 07:08, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per above. DarthVader 09:39, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. Zadkiel's Almanack had a print run of up to 200,000 according to his obit in The Times, which also mentions various books on astrology. --Squiddy | (squirt ink?) 10:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• I predict a... keep. I've added sources that verify his notability (especially the first one of the external links: fascinating!), and would ask that someone does a clean up and wikify exercise. Vizjim 14:31, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep. He's not the most notable guy ever, but the reasons for the existence of a page on Morrison are rather clearly defined in the article. -- Kicking222 15:53, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. The page provides the assertion of notability. I see that Zadkiel's Almanack is available on the Barnes and Noble website. Fluit 17:42, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep per Squiddy. Mangojuice^talk 18:55, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
• Cleanup and keep as slightly notable. —Mets501^talk 15:47, 13 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.