This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Mindspillage(spill yours?) 03:39, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
Seems to be a hoax. The word, when on google, turns up 4 hits, two of which is Swedish wikipedia, the other two in languages I don't know. Even if it were real a non existant product that stars in an adverstisment is not encyclopedic. Delete. Sabine's Sunbird 21:59, 26 May 2005 (UTC)
I saw that commercial. I laughed. Not encyclopedic. Delete. RickK 19:21, May 27, 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.