Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Qui-Gon Jinn 12" Inch

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 16:32, 3 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Qui-Gon Jinn 12" Inch

Not at all notable. I recommend deletion of images too upon close.

• Ah right, 12" is his height (well, at least that's a novel measurement for crap arround here)delete --Doc (?) 22:34, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Individual dolls are not notable just because they're "hard to get", and Wikipedia is, presumably, not a guide for collectors. I must admit, though, when I saw the title of the page, I was absolutely terrified thinking about what I was going to see. Lord Bob 23:27, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or merge somewhere, real product from notable manufacturer. Kappa 00:20, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, a toy must be very notable to warrant its own article and this isn't that notable. -- Kjkolb 02:40, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, non notable. Saberwyn 04:20, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Wikipedia is not Ebay. -- Riffsyphon1024 01:42, 27 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, one individual model of a star wars figurine is not individually notable. --DropDeadGorgias (talk) 21:24, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• keep or merge this somewhere please it is a rare item Yuckfoo 21:48, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Keep or merge per kappa and Deletion policy. According to our deletion policy, a subject that is "such a minor branch of a subject that it doesn't deserve an article" is one of the "problems that don't require deletion", and the correct action to take is not to list on AfD at all, but "Merge the useful content into a more comprehensive article and redirect". This article should never have made it as far as AfD according to the deletion policy. Administrators are busy enough as it is. Anybody can merge, and if the're not doing so they need to be told loudly and clearly that AfD is not a place to take articles that are obvious merge candidates under the deletion policy. Just do it. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 22:50, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Individual article not warranted, just one unsourced assertion of being "very rare and hard to get." That sort of repetitive redundancy seems to be a pattern (see the title - 12" Inch). Can't find a place to merge to - best candidate I could locate for this sort of phenomenon is that the Star Wars article has a redlink to Star Wars toys. Substantive contributions there would be welcome. --Michael Snow 23:51, 29 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - Individual toys? Why don't we have an article for every single Barbie iteration? NO. - Hahnchen 03:37, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
  • Please don't give them ideas. Now some wise guy's going to get to work on those and we'll be voting on them for the next four months... Lord Bob 03:39, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• omg... deleet  Grue  07:40, 30 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - encyclopedia and not notable --Henrygb 22:51, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per deletion policy: idiosyncratic non-topic. The Literate Engineer 04:45, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.