The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 19:42, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
The title, in addition to its obvious capitalization mistakes, is inheritantly POV. The author admits to taking the information from a third-party site that is copyrighted. The article is completely unencyclopedic in its listing of hadith and then an immediate critique on the aforementioned hadith. Delete. Pepsidrinka 19:36, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete per nom. total nonsense. Zzzzz 21:26, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
Delete Not nonsense, but definitely original research. howcheng {chat} 22:09, 22 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.