Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quest Magazine

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 14:03, 9 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Quest Magazine

Delete. This is a non-notable online magazine, with less than 10 relevant Google hits and no reputable citations that are not self-referential. MSJapan 10:52, 1 January 2006 (UTC)

• This afd nomination was orphaned. Listing now. —Crypticbot (operator) 15:50, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, notability not established. Its main editor also claims it now to be a copvio as well. Phaedriel 18:54, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Uninformed, misinforming, insignificant, prob self-promoting. Quest Magazine's presence on Wikipedia is malformed. . Grye 20:04, 1 January 2006 (UTC)
• Author of article I am a newbie. I also created about seven articles, including one for another magazine, not at all connected with Quest. Five came directly from Quest Magazine. I created the articles with the understanding that Wikipedia policed them somewhat. I have been polite with the exception of one remark I made to user Grye who has been nothing but rude and a vandal by removing the source from the List of Masonic organizations (an article from Quest). The people I know at Quest want their articles removed because of the conduct of Wikipedians like Grye that goes unchecked. -Edit by User:Wandering Writer, notation of which by Grye

  Is that a vote? For? Against?!? -OK to delete mine with the edit above. Grye 19:50, 2 January 2006 (UTC)

  • Comment: Wikipedia doesn't police articles. The moment you write an article, it stops being yours and can be edited by anyone. --Pablo D. Flores (Talk) 15:03, 6 January 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.