Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queens: The Musical

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. —Kurykh 23:52, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Queens: The Musical

Queens: The Musical (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

About an avant-garde and revolutionary piece of theatre, written by Marty Pilkiewicz (a student). After a detailed plot summary and much other fascinating material, the article ends on a bathetic note: The play was awarded a disappointingly low mark for the students' [sic] Practical Module (56) which is widely attributed to Dr Grant's personal antipathy towards the play as well as the snobbishness of the external examiners who preferred more conservative and abstract theatre. My sympathies, but I'm not convinced that the play is notable. This was prodded, since which time the original author did not remove the prod notice but did amend the article in small ways; I took this to imply a desire to retain the article, removed the prod, and, ladies and gentlemen of the jury, leave its fate in your hands. Hoary 10:53, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

• Article to be taken from this place and Deleted until dead. It fails the old favourite of Verifiability, with only a few Google references to it's name, but as it appears to be a drama student's examination piece it strikes me as fairly one-sided, blog-esque and, ultimately, non-notable. OBM | ^{blah blah blah} 11:17, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• As to the charges of violating WP:NOT, WP:ATT, and others, I find this article guilty on all counts. Delete EyeSerene^TALK 13:05, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete and purge with fire: Come to think of it, to the above reasons, we could quite readily add that Wikipedia is not for plays made up in school one day. This is also the sole activity of the creator (thus probable WP:COI), and the recreation of an article AfD'd a month ago.  RGTraynor  13:09, 2 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Unverifiable and not notable. 6thAvenue 16:39, 2 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.