Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen sacrifice example

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge and delete. BorgQueen 15:05, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Queen sacrifice example

Queen sacrifice example (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

I don't think we need an entire article just to illustrate one example of a queen sacrifice in chess. About a year ago it was started as a sub-article for Queen sacrifice but since then it hasn't gained any content other than the images. Crystallina 02:52, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete anything that is on there could easily be placed on Queen sacrifice. Darthgriz98 03:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related-related deletions. -- SkierRMH 03:42, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge then delete pretty clear; not worthy of own article. Akihabara 05:49, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 06:12, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge & Delete per nom. Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C 08:35, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge per above. James086Talk 13:16, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Merge and delete This article proveides no context, but the images could be added in the main article. FrancoGG ( talk ) 14:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - The article should be merged and then deleted as it's not really got enough important info on it to have its own article. Should be deleted soon. Tellyaddict 15:09, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above. The images can be useful. ← ANAS Talk? 20:24, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete without merging. The example is pretty poor - I don't think a two-move combination counts as a Queen sac at all. It shouldn't be too hard to find a famous sacrifice to illustrate the idea. A better player than I would have to do it, though... -- Bpmullins | Talk 21:00, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • 'Merge per above. Stand-alone example provides no context and is largely uninterpreable without the Queen Sacrifice article to support it. Also, it would be nice to have a notable example. --Shirahadasha 21:03, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, don't merge. The main article queen sacrifice speaks for itself. The additional diagrams are not particularly useful, and are not conventional to use in most other Wikipedia chess articles. YechielMan 00:58, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. A single example does not normally deserve an article, and this example is stunningly uninteresting. An article devoted to a tactical theme, I could see, or something particularly notable like Philidor's legacy or the Saavedra study. But this, no. --OinkOink 04:26, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.