Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Queen's Players

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep, but verify claims. - ulayiti (talk) 13:27, 20 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Queen's Players

Non-notable, unverified. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information. Delete Ardenn 18:57, 14 May 2006 (UTC)

• Weak Keep if verified. It's been around for 100 years, thats fairly noteworthy. - pm_shef 19:08, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Merge into Queen's University Weak Delete it doesn't seem to be notable enough, but perhaps it could be verified. joturner 20:13, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep or merge into Queen's U. if verifed -- getcrunkjuice^contribs 22:44, 14 May 2006 (UTC)
• It's been around for a century and has some pretty well-known members -- if these two points could be verified, I would say Keep. Otherwise, I'd agree with the nom. --Skeezix1000 18:41, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

According to Google, there's not a lot out there. It appears as though the club has been around for ages, and Davies and Greene were members ([1]), and apparently Ashleigh Banfield was also a member ([2]). Just about everything else is a Wiki mirror. I still say keep, but more sources would be nice. --Skeezix1000 18:48, 15 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.