Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quedding

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Jinian 21:38, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Quedding

Apparent neologism with no immediately discoverable usage. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:06, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• As stated on the article's talk page: As it stands, this is simply a dictionary definition and should probably be placed on gay slang. However, there may be a need for a Same-sex wedding article, in which case it should be redirected. Exploding Boy 20:38, Apr 7, 2005 (UTC)
  • It's a dictionary definition of a word that doesn't seem to exist other than on Wikipedia. If it doesn't have sufficient usage to rate even a single mention on Google (other than the 100 or so mentions of people by the name), and if I've never heard it from any of my gay friends in San Francisco or Las Vegas, it's hard to believe it's anything other than a minor local usage, if even that. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 20:50, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete – Google give 110 hits, all surnames. This strongly suggests that it's a neologism. – ClockworkSoul 23:18, 7 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Neologism, apparently appearing nowhere but Wikipedia. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 23:26, 10 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Oh, if I didn't make it clear, Delete. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 01:21, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.