Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quatrick

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 14:35, 4 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quatrick

Quatrick (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Seems like a pretty blatant neologism/thing made up one day (original "research" would be being kind, but the article engages in the "defence of necessity" that it "was introduced because the term double hat-trick was ambiguous"), but I'll refrain from speedying or PRODing this out of consideration of the possibility that this has become a notable term in the last four days -- despite no google news hits, and a mention in only one blog that I could find. Alai 00:04, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete judging from google, it seems to have been re-coined a few times rather than circulating as currency. jnestorius(talk) 00:38, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete the references don't even contain the term. --YbborT SURVEY! 01:34, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
    • The "references" seem simply to be copied from hat-trick, where they were included to document use of "double hat-trick" for the same concept. Alai 02:03, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as a term without any currency at the moment (all the reports I've read about the match talk about a double hat-trick and don't care about the possible ambiguity). If it happens several more times, the term might enter the realms of notability. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 09:06, 31 March 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - very minor usage in online forms (230 Google hits, not all in this context) but absolutely no sign in anywhere reliable I can find (e.g. NewsBank). Tearlach 02:34, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.