Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Quasi-legislative

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was nomination withdrawn. Non-admin closure. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 02:02, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Quasi-legislative

Quasi-legislative (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

Contested prod, removed by author. Article is entirely original research and an essay. Cites no secondary sources; fails WP:RS, WP:V, WP:OR. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 03:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Comment I see you've been trying to speedy and prod this article since 6 minutes after its creation. I can't find any evidence you've tried to work with the editor who has expanded the article considerably since that point (when it may have deserved it) in order to stress the importance of sources. Is this how we work with newbies now, the whip first? --Dhartung | Talk 08:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment: I speedied it, then removed it. Someone else prod'd the article on their own, and then the author removed that. — HelloAnnyong (say whaaat?!) 12:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Keep The term is legitimate, and has quite a bit of coverage in peer-reviewed government and law journals. A (very) brief survey turned up a few articles specifically working with the quasi-legislative model, and I'm certain there are more. Coanda-1910 (talk) 01:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.